Thursday, September 14, 2006

Experimenting on myself

Abstract: The effects of intentional overexposure to Shakespearean tragedy were examined. Over the course of several days the subject watched and/or listened to various recordings of Hamlet and, at times not so occupied, made note of his thoughts and feelings. Depression was the most frequently observed mood and could not be attributed to other causes, suggesting that care should be taken to limit exposure to Shakespearean tragedy, particularly for sensitive groups such as school-age youth.

Introduction: Hamlet remains one of the most popular works of English literature taught in schools (Herz and Hinton, 1996). Given the serious nature of the work, however, with its themes of suicide, incest, and murder, concerns over whether overexposure might be harmful to school-age youth are not unfounded. In this study a male (Asian graduate student, age 30) was exposed to numerous recordings of Hamlet on successive nights (i.e. a Hamlet "marathon") and asked to document changes in mental state. In addition to a number of benign effects (e.g. inclusion of archaic language and speech patterns), an overall negative change in mood amounting to depression was noted.

Methods: Four recordings of Hamlet were borrowed from the Ann Arbor District Library: DVDs of the Derek Jacobi version (1980), the Mel Gibson version (1990), and the Ethan Hawke version (2000) and CDs of the Kenneth Branagh version (1993). DVDs were watched by the subject on successive evenings between September 10th and 13th of 2006 (designated Days 1 and 4, respectively), and the CD was played continuously in the subject's car.

Results and Discussion: The subject noted that by Day 2 of the experiment his mood had become "foul" and by Day 3 his wit had become "diseased". On Day 4 he noted on a scrap of paper, "I have of late lost all my mirth." During this time the subject continued to perform his normal activities, the bulk of which comprised eating, sleeping, going to work, going to the gym, and going to the bathroom. No other changes in routine were observed. By the end of the experiment, the subject was using non-idiomatic vocabulary and phrasing; e.g. when asked by another graduate student how long he had been at the university, he answered, "I hesitate to say. To think on't only encourages woe." The experiment was terminated early; additional recordings of Hamlet had been requested at the library and were awaiting pick-up.

The mechanism by which overexposure to Shakespearean tragedy leads to depression remains to be discovered. Intermediate steps cannot be ruled out. For instance, it is possible that usage of non-idiomatic vocabulary and phrasing alienates others, particularly strangers, and that alienation is the proximal cause of negative feelings. However, the most parsimonious explanation is that the content of tragedy itself evokes empathy in its observer and that this empathy in excess can be detrimental. These results suggest that discretion should be used in the teaching of Shakespearean tragedy, particularly to sensitive groups such as school-age youth. Further studies should address specific dosage and the lack of controls in the current study design (e.g. does overexposure to Shakespearean comedy have the same effects?).

2 Comments:

At Sat Sep 16, 11:53:00 AM EDT, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Letter to the editor

Dear Sirs:

The recent case study on the psychological impact of Shakespearean tragedy leaves much to be desired in regards to ethical and scientific considerations. We note first and foremost that guidelines for human experimentation set forth by the University of Michigan's Human Research Protection Program were blatantly disregarded. In particular, Part 7 of the Operations Manual lays out a detailed data and safety monitoring plan. The subject under study shows significant proneness to predisposing conditions that clearly qualify him for the status of "Vulnerable Subject," according to Part 7, Section III of the operations manual. Specifically, his status as a 30-year-old graduate student qualifies him as a member of group "Prisoners (individuals involuntarily confined or detained by a penal institution)" and also of group "Individuals who may be subject to coercion or undue influence (e.g. economically or educationally disadvantaged persons) (emphasis ours).

These concerns also extend to the scientific merit of the investigation, and the implicit a priori hypotheses assumed by the researcher(s). Since the subject was already predisposed to erratic changes in mood common to senior graduate students, one would need to demonstrate that the problem was indeed with Shakspeare exposure, and not confounding factors. Indeed,

"He does confess he feels himself distracted;
But from what cause he will by no means speak."

Alack, the complete lack of control population and testing of implicit hypotheses has set back the cause of quantitative Shakespeare studies by years.

As we may ask,

"To be depressed by Shakespeare, or not to be depressed by Shakespeare: that is the question:
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of classical literature,
(yadda, yadda, yadda)."

J.J. et al.
The Center for Quantitative Shakespeare Psychology on Well-Qualified Human Subjects and Siamese Cats
1557 East Hall
(enter through broken window in the atrium)
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI

 
At Tue Sep 19, 06:56:00 PM EDT, Anonymous Anonymous said...

As I am nowhere as eloquent as JJ or the author himself in this instance, I only write to add that if a certain JL became aware of the existence of this poignant piece, he/she might be inclined to comment quite favorably. *shine*

 

Post a Comment

<< Home